To true believers, the Loch Ness Monster is a relic from the Cretaceous that survived the great extinction. Could it really have been a long-necked plesiosaur ?
1) No, eels and an excess consumption of Scottish Whisky explain the sightings.
2) No, Plesiosaurs were exclusively saltwater animals.
3) Not unless Nessie does the backstroke, as the plesiosaur's neck was adapted for feeding on the bottom, not for stretching up out of water.
Find The Answer Here.
Posts
McGregor Ancestry, Glasgow, Scotland
-
This evening, I am posting information on McGregor family history as
sourced from a memorial at Eastwood New Cemetery. This records the death of:
- Ia...
28 minutes ago
Plesiosaurs were not exclusively salt water. Some, including one of the largest pliosaurs, Kronosaurus are found in freshwater or estuarine deposits.
ReplyDeleteOf course, the Loch Ness monster could not be a plesiosaurs for a host of other reasons.
Why the Loch Ness monster is not a plesiosaur